If the European armies have their eyes fixed on Russia and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, the US Navy, for its part, only has its eyes on the probable conflict which would pit it against the Navy and air forces of the People's Liberation Army, in the event of a Chinese naval and air blockade of the island of Taiwan.
The deadline of 2027, initially set by Admiral Phil Davidson in 2021, concerning the probable zone of conflict with Beijing, is approaching, pressure is mounting on the US Navy, which must respond to both the military and industrial challenge posed. by the People's Liberation Army and its Navy, which receives around ten large surface combatants and two submarines each year.
While American shipbuilding is still encountering significant difficulties, and the US Navy's planning is only just recovering from a period of intense chaos, it must now make choices. This is precisely what it did, by favoring short-term naval production, and postponing most major medium-term programs such as F/A-XX, SSN(x) or DDG(x).
In this section:
The threat of a Chinese blockade of Taiwan requires a massive and available fleet by 2027.
From Admiral Phil Davidson's announcement, then commander of the Pacific theater, on the subject of the possible confrontation between the United States and China, from 2027, Pentagon analysts above all confirmed the fears expressed then by the American general officer.
Thus, from 2022, the Chief Naval Officer, or CNO, Admiral Gilday, the equivalent of the chief of staff for the American Navy, indicated that the Pentagon was actively working, and mainly, on the scenarios opposing the Chinese Navy around Taiwan, from 2027.
In 2023, it was the turn of Admiral John Aquilino, the successor to Admiral Davidson at the head of the US Indo-Pacific Command (INDOPACOM), to draw up a most worrying picture concerning the rise of naval assets and Chinese air forces, designed, according to him, to gain the upper hand over American forces by 2027, around Taiwan, as part of China's new five-year planning.
These concerns and alarming reports were echoed in the design of the Pentagon's 2025 budget. Indeed, in it, the American armies, in particular the US Navy, seemed to give priority to increasing the resilience of American forces deployed in the Pacific, but also in the evolution of industrial tools, precisely to support this potential conflict, deemed increasingly inevitable by the Pentagon.
Serial reports concerning the major structuring programs of the US Navy
These efforts in favor of immediate and short-term capacities, in the 2025 budget, and beyond, had to be the subject budgetary arbitrations, the US Navy's resources have not evolved proportionately.
There are 75% of this article left to read, Subscribe to access it!
The Classic subscriptions provide access to
articles in their full version, and without advertising,
from €1,99. Subscriptions Premium also allow access to archives (articles over two years old)
Christmas promotion : 15% discount on Premium and Classic subscriptions annual with the code MetaXmas2024, from 11/12 to 27/12 only.
I would have a solution… they buy us a few boats…
They tried with the Italians, it was not a success 😉