Since the Chechen War, the Russian armies, as well as the country's industrialists, have set up a very effective feedback mechanism allowing the rapid integration of lessons from the field, to improve or correct the deficiencies observed in the equipment. . This mechanism was particularly widely used during the Russian intervention in Syria, with many very numerous modifications made to almost all the deployed systems on the spot. In addition, the conflict served as a testing ground for many new systems, be they drones, fighter jets, anti-aircraft systems, armor or robotic systems.
In this context, he could not escape the Russian planners the preponderant role of Azeri drones, and especially the vagabond ammunition of Israeli invoice like Harop, Harpy and Defender 1C, during the Nagorno-Karabakh war which opposed the Azerbaijani and Armenian forces for more than months in the Caucasus. These stray munitions, associated with effective jamming implemented by the Azeri forces, in particular dealt very severe blows to the armored forces and to the Armenian anti-aircraft defense systems of Russian origin, including the most modern such as the TOR M1.
The rest of this article is for subscribers only
Articles with full free access are available in the "Free Articles" section. Subscribers have full access to News, Analysis and Summary articles. Articles in Archives (more than 2 years old) are reserved for professional subscribers.
Monthly subscription at € 5,90 per month - Personal subscription at € 49,5 per year - Professional subscription at € 180 per year - Student subscription at € 25 per year - Excluding promotional code -
Download theMobile Meta-Defense app for IOS or Android to be informed of new publications by notification.